On 2GIS, the rating of this facility is slightly lower, at just 4*. But there are only two comments.
Olfactory hallucinations
Olfactory hallucinations – are delusions about the sense of smell, characterized by the perception of smells that do not exist in reality. Those affected can perceive neutral, repellent and pleasant smells. Smells can be perceived as coming from outside, originating from within the body, located in the intrapsychic space and perceived through an 'inner sense of smell'. Common variants include the smell of burning, rotting flesh, putrefaction and poison. Diagnosis relies on interview, observation and odor identification tests. Symptomatic therapy is based on the use of neuroleptics.
General characteristics.
Olfactory hallucinations vary in their content. Unpleasant odor ideas are predominantly associated with depressive moods, including anxiety, fear and distrust. Patients smell rot, decay, toxic substances, stale air. To relieve the sensations, they hold their nose, stuff cotton wool up their nose, ventilate the room for no objective reason, or use air fresheners. These hallucinations often form the basis for delusions, such as: B. the use of poisons by the perpetrators or the storage of corpses.
Olfactory hallucinations with pleasant content are represented by the smell of flowers, delicious food and favorite perfumes. Often patients cannot guess the source of the smell and describe it as ethereal, joyful and inspiring. Hallucinatory experiences accompany ecstatic, manic states. Neutral odors are generally not perceived by people and are not a reason for complaints.
Olfactory hallucinations are differentiated based on where patients identify their source. It can be found in the environment (outside, in a neighboring room), in the patient's body or in an imaginary space (in the air, 'in the soul' - in mental space). As a rule, the unpleasant smell of poison, rot, impurity is described as coming from external objects; the smell of sweat, urine, and decaying organs is described as coming from one's own body. The imaginary causes of pleasant smells are magical, mystical sources that cannot be found in the physical world.
'Gam-Covid-Vac is Sputnik V or not.
The battle to boost the immunity of adults and children has been waged by pharmaceutical giants for two years. The flood of information about medicines, their production, delivery, use and comparisons can confuse anyone, so we repeat: GAM-COVID-Vac is Sputnik V, two names for the same vaccine.
The introduction of a fourth Russian vaccine called Sputnik Light caused further confusion. The fact is that this 'Light' was developed by the same Gamaley Nitsam. In addition, it is half of GAM-COVID-VAC, because it is the first component of this drug, the second is not used, this version of the vaccine is recommended for booster and vaccination of COVID-19 patients who have been infected .
In addition, questions have been raised about the introduction of GAM-COVID-Vac-Lio, which is not a new vaccine. Gam-Covid-Vac-Lio is a vaccine preparation, a lyophilisate for the preparation of a solution that looks like a dry, porous mass in tablet form, solid or crushed, white in color.
Instructions for use for 'Gam-Covid-Vac'
The instructions for use have changed several times and will continue to change during the Phase III study. For example:
- in the instructions for the first batches of the drug, pregnancy was a contraindication to vaccination, while now it no longer applies;
- In the August 12, 2020 version of the guidelines there were 2 manufacturers listed, in the December 2, 2020 version there were 4 and now there are 8 manufacturers;
- The protective antibody titers are currently unknown.
- The duration of protection is unknown.
- Clinical studies on epidemiological effectiveness have not been conducted.
Sursil ortho opinions.
Media registration certificate IA#FS77-56094 dated November 15, 2013 issued by the Federal Service for Supervision of Communications, Information Technologies and Mass Media (Roskomnadzor).
Media registration certificate El №FS77-56357 dated December 02, 2013, issued by the Federal Service for Supervision of Communications, Information Technologies and Mass Media (Roskomnadzor).
Founder LLC Institute of Information Technology
Stepana Razina Street 16, Yekaterinburg, 620142 (3rd floor)
The use of the agency's material is only permitted with the permission of the editorial team.
The opinion of the editors does not necessarily correspond to the opinion of the authors.
We are not responsible for the content of comments on this website. Comments on the material on this website are the personal opinions of visitors to this website.
All material on this website is in the public domain.
'The auditorium is a sports hall'.
A much higher rating for one of the school buildings. More precisely, the building on Magistralna Street, 133b. Its average rating is 3. And 21 Yandex users decided to express their opinion about the school. Let's start with the positive reviews:
– Excellent school, good director, good teachers and team atmosphere. My daughter and I went to class and have not regretted our decision. Then we went to college and now we're studying on a budget,' says Ljudmila Tjavina.
And that's the only detailed comment. Several others left modest comments such as 'good or excellent school/good teachers'. One Alexei Ivanovich, who gave the school a 4 rating, said that 'the teacher was bought a laptop and a camera'.
Several other Samara residents gave the school a grade of 3 and shared their opinions about the school's shortcomings:
– 'There are no normal repairs,' said Netu Lenchik.
– You should set up a normal gym with equipment. Now the auditorium and the gym are one and the same place,' complained Tamara S.
– Everything is very poor, and it is, after all, a primary school. The canteen is not suitable for eating. There is no gym or sports field. The classrooms are small. The children are unhappy. But the authorities are trying to do their best for the students. However, they are unable to build a new school or carry out major repairs,' Mikhail Abramov, a resident of Samara, explained his assessment.
– I have been at this school since 2017. I can describe the advantages and disadvantages. First: There are different financial options. For this reason, there are no renovations and the facilities are not good. Second: the canteen. There are rumors that you can find hair in food. Apparently that's why many people prefer to walk to the store. Especially on days when there are a lot of classes. Third - the lessons themselves. At my previous school I consistently got a 4, now I can barely manage a 3. I don't absolve myself of guilt because I learned less, but the teachers also make the lessons boring! I used to love Russian and math, but not anymore,' said user Sevil Sh.
The best of the worst
And our list is completed by school. It is located at Kakhovskaya St. 7. Its rating on Yandex is 3.3. And it was commented on by 29 web users.
Despite this low rating, 14 commenters praised the teachers and 13 praised the staff. Here's what other commenters wrote:
– I went to this school in . It was a good school, the teachers were an authority for us, we respected them,' said Tatiana Soskova.
Marina Somninskaya, who went to school here from 1968 to 1971, had the same fond memories of the Soviet past. Along with them, several other Samara residents also fell into nostalgia.
Several users pointed to the current contingent of students at this school as a disadvantage. Here's what they write about it:
– When I studied here myself, everything was great: both the teachers and the director. But my children did not experience this happiness. Now the school is in terrible condition. And it's not just about extensive renovations, but also about the administrative staff. But that most likely won't happen. School is no longer in demand. Locals try not to bring their children here, but for visitors from the sunny republics, the school has enough potential to entertain them, says Ludmila.
Several other people made similar comments about the school.
But most of the negative and negative opinions related to the condition of the building.
– It's terrible to even walk past this school,' wrote Marina Tyutereva.
– It would be good to renovate them, and not just the classrooms. This is a completely normal Soviet school. It is a shame that not all of our children deserve modern schools. After all, we have so many stadiums and roofs to build,' complained Galina M.
Read more:- Sursil Ortho made-to-measure insoles.
- Sursil Ortho made-to-measure insoles.
- Medico Ortho reviews.
- Sursil ortho size grid.
- Plus ortho ratings.
- Salon orthopedic orthopraim reviews.
- insoles for shoes.
- Making hooves for shoes.